What it is
Auto liability policies are usually stated as a split-limit structure: a per-person bodily injury limit (e.g., $25,000), a per-occurrence bodily injury limit covering all injured persons in one accident (e.g., $50,000), and a property damage limit (e.g., $25,000). The common shorthand is "25/50/25." States set minimum required limits that vary widely — California minimum is $30,000/$60,000/$15,000 for accidents after January 1, 2025; many states still have $25,000/$50,000/$25,000 minimums; a handful require even less. Higher-income drivers and commercial policies routinely carry $100,000, $250,000, $500,000, or $1,000,000+ in liability limits, plus umbrella policies that extend coverage further. The per-person limit caps what any single claimant can recover from that policy; the per-occurrence limit caps the total across all claimants in one accident. A claim that exceeds the policy limits requires the claimant to look elsewhere — UIM coverage, the defendant's personal assets, or related defendants (employer for vicarious liability, dram-shop defendant in DUI cases).
How it works in practice
Once the claimant or their attorney obtains the at-fault driver's policy declarations page (the "dec sheet"), the available limits become a key strategic input. A policy-limits demand is a formal written demand for the full available limits, typically sent when damages clearly exceed those limits. The demand triggers the insurer's duty to act in good faith — to settle within limits when liability is clear and damages exceed limits — because failure to do so exposes the INSURER to liability for the full excess judgment if the case goes to trial and the verdict exceeds limits. This dynamic, known as "bad faith failure to settle," is the most powerful leverage point in any high-damages, low-limits case. Multiple claimants in a single accident must share the per-occurrence limit; if total damages exceed the per-occurrence limit, the insurer typically interpleads the funds into court and lets the claimants and the court allocate them. In multi-defendant cases, each defendant's individual policy applies separately.
How Policy Limits affects your settlement
Policy limits are the most underestimated single factor in personal injury settlement value, and they cut both ways. For below-limits cases (damages less than available coverage), policy limits are largely irrelevant — the negotiation is about case value. For above-limits cases, policy limits often ARE the case value, regardless of how strong the damages claim is, because the at-fault driver typically has no recoverable personal assets. A claimant with $200,000 in damages struck by a driver with $25,000 in liability coverage and no UIM is realistically looking at a $25,000 recovery, not $200,000. This is where UIM, bad-faith, and policy-limits demands become decisive. A timely, well-documented policy-limits demand triggers the insurer's duty to settle within limits; if the insurer refuses despite clear liability and damages, and the case proceeds to a verdict above the limits, the insurer (not the at-fault driver) becomes liable for the entire excess. This is the lever that converts a $25,000-limit case into a much larger recovery. Conversely, a botched policy-limits demand (missing required elements, missing the response deadline, ambiguous terms) can squander the leverage and leave the claimant capped at the limits with no recourse. Practical takeaways: (1) ALWAYS get the declarations page early in any serious-injury case, (2) when damages exceed limits, send a properly structured policy-limits demand with a hard response deadline, (3) understand that the at-fault driver's policy limits are the ceiling unless UIM or excess assets are available.
Related SetCalc guides
Related glossary terms
Informational only and not legal advice. Settlement-dollar implications described here reflect typical patterns and may differ in any specific case. Confirm the analysis for your situation with a licensed attorney.